Cripps v. Liquor Control Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
These facts material to our decision upon this appeal are not in dispute: The plaintiff is the holder o.f a tavern permit covering premises in Woodbury operated by him as a tavern. He was summoned to a hearing before the defendant on June 8, 1942, to answer charges preferred by it, among them one that he had violated § 1071c of the Cumulative Supplement, 1935, of the General Statutes by the sale or delivery of alcoholic liquor to a minor. He appeared with counsel. After hearing, the defendant imposed a three weeks suspension of his permit for this violation. Upon appeal, the Court of Common…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grady v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Demond v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Schroeder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Greist v. AmrhynSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Rose v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dadiskos v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Sumara v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Dudow v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Balog v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Kantrowitz v. Liquor Control CommissionPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.