Legal Opinion

Dudow v. Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 4, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiffs, Nick S. Dudow and Walter N. Dudow, are permittee and backer, respectively, of a restaurant liquor permit for premises located at 259-261 Congress Avenue in New Haven. On November 1, 1944, the defendant suspended their permit for an indefinite period on the grounds that the place was an unsuitable place because it was not kept, used, maintained, advertised and held out to the public as one where the regular service of hot meals at least twice daily was the principal business conducted therein, and that the permittee was an unsuitable person in that he had falsified his records…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grady v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Demond v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. Skarzynski v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Cripps v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  5. Neubauer v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. KrauseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Cichon v. Liquor Control CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1946
  3. Fennelly v. Liquor Control CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1951
  4. Fennelly v. Liquor Control CommissionPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API