Legal Opinion

Sumara v. Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 4, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.

The defendant liquor control commission, after notice and a hearing held June 18, 1970, found that the plaintiff had violated two conditions of holding a liquor permit and suspended his permit for a period of thirty days on each charge. The suspensions were to run concurrently. The first charge alleged violation of § 30-6-A24 of the commission’s regulations, in that the plaintiff permitted “a disturbance, brawl, unlawful conduct upon the permit premises” and permitted the premises “to be conducted in such a manner as to constitute a nuisance.” The second charge concerned the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Demond v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Hoffman v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. DiSesa v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Cripps v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  5. Aminti v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Town of Greenwich v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Oliver v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
  3. Slimp v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Fico v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. City of New Haven v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsConnecticut Superior Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API