Sumara v. Liquor Control Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
The defendant liquor control commission, after notice and a hearing held June 18, 1970, found that the plaintiff had violated two conditions of holding a liquor permit and suspended his permit for a period of thirty days on each charge. The suspensions were to run concurrently. The first charge alleged violation of § 30-6-A24 of the commission’s regulations, in that the plaintiff permitted “a disturbance, brawl, unlawful conduct upon the permit premises” and permitted the premises “to be conducted in such a manner as to constitute a nuisance.” The second charge concerned the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Demond v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Hoffman v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- DiSesa v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Cripps v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Aminti v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Town of Greenwich v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Oliver v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
- Slimp v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Fico v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- City of New Haven v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsConnecticut Superior Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.