Nielson v. Droubay
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
Plaintiffs, the Nielsons, initiated this action to evict the defendants, the Droubays, from a home and ranch properties. The Droubays were in possession under an option to purchase from the Nielsons. Niel-sons’ position is that the Droubays did not comply with the terms of the option and that a contract of purchase was not consummated. Droubays answered and counterclaimed, denying Nielsons’ allegations and asserting that the terms of the option agreement had been complied with and that it was because of Nielsons’ failure to proceed in good faith to honor the terms of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Richards v. HodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Ruffinengo v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- FMA Financial Corp. v. Hansen Dairy, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Geisdorf v. DoughtyUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Baxter v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Crane v. Timberbrook Village, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Estate Landscape v. MOUNTAIN STATES TEL.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.