Legal Opinion

Richards v. Hodson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1971No. 12338PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

The plaintiffs, real estate brokers, had a listing signed by Mr. Hodson whereby he promised to pay them a commission of 6% of the sale price of some real estate jointly owned by him and his wife if the plaintiffs found a purchaser who was ready, willing, and able to buy. This action is against both Mr. and Mrs. Hodson for a commission claimed to have been earned, together with an attorney’s fee.

The defendants deny that any enforceable contract of sale was entered into and also claim misconduct and false representations on the part of plaintiffs’ agent, who induced them to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. F. M. A. Financial Corp. v. Build, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Ney v. HarrisonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Butler v. ButlerUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Holbrook v. HodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Norman v. Murray First Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bowen ex rel. Doe v. ArnoldTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bradshaw v. KershawUtah Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API