Legal Opinion

Ruffinengo v. Miller

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1978No. 15348PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*343HALL, Justice:

Plaintiff (hereinafter “Ruffinengo”) appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his suit to enjoin the construction of a house by defendants (hereinafter “Miller”) alleged to be in violation of a restrictive covenant prohibiting the construction of dwellings in excess of two stories.

The basic facts presented to the trial court are as follows: the litigants. are the owners of adjacent lots in Northerest Subdivision which share a common boundary, although one lot is in Plat “E” and the other in Plat “F” of said subdivision; the two plats were developed by separate corporate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Korn v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Hayes v. GibbsUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Halling v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In Re the Estates of WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gottsch v. Bank of StapletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Brickyard Homeowners' Ass'n Management Committee v. Gibbons Realty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Themy v. Seagull Enterprises, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Celebrity Club Inc. v. Utah Liquor Control CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API