Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Utah Department of Transportation

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1985No. 19097PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

In this quiet title action, defendant Utah Department of Transportation moved for and was granted summary judgment in the trial court on the basis that a judgment in a prior action collaterally estopped plaintiffs from bringing this action. Plaintiffs appeal, claiming that the prior action does not bind them since they were neither party nor privy to it.

At a Davis County tax sale in 1969, plaintiff Ronald L. Baxter, together with Ronald Toone and Thomas Hollberg (owner of plaintiff Rio Vista Oil), purchased an 18-acre tract of land from defendant Davis County. The deed was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Elliott v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Talbot v. Quaker-State Oil Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pacific Frontier v. Pleasant Grove CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Yorulmazoglu v. Lake Forest HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Brigham Young University v. Tremco Consultants, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hill v. Seattle First National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Baxter v. Utah Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API