Regents of University of California v. Sheily
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.
Aaron H. Sheily, D.D.S. (Dr. Sheily, or appellant) appeals from a judgment denying his claim for compensation for goodwill in a bifurcated condemnation action brought by the Regents of the University of California (Regents, or respondent). The action was brought to acquire by condemnation Dr. Sheily’s leasehold interest in an office building in the City of Santa Monica. In a bench trial, the court concluded that Dr. Sheily failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he was entitled to compensation for loss of goodwill, under the requisites of Code of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- City of Lincoln v. BarringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Avidity Partners v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. IbarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Liberty National Enterprises v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.