Legal Opinion

Regents of University of California v. Sheily

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 2004No. B161797PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.

Aaron H. Sheily, D.D.S. (Dr. Sheily, or appellant) appeals from a judgment denying his claim for compensation for goodwill in a bifurcated condemnation action brought by the Regents of the University of California (Regents, or respondent). The action was brought to acquire by condemnation Dr. Sheily’s leasehold interest in an office building in the City of Santa Monica. In a bench trial, the court concluded that Dr. Sheily failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he was entitled to compensation for loss of goodwill, under the requisites of Code of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. City of Lincoln v. BarringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Avidity Partners v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. IbarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Liberty National Enterprises v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API