Legal Opinion
Mahdavi v. Fair Employment Practice Com.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1977No. Civ. 38258PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEINBERGER, J. *
This is an appeal from a superior court judgment denying appellant’s petition for a peremptory writ of mandate and discharging the alternative writ issued. The petition was filed purportedly “pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5” and claimed that “respondent committed prejudicial abuses of discretion and denied petitioner a fair trial.” The abuses of discretion allegedly were (a) that the investigation was done “in such a perfunctory manner that there was effectively no investigation within the meaning of Labor Code §§ 1421 and 1423;” (b) the failure of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Saleeby v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Friends of Old Trees v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- McGill v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Superior Court of Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.