Legal Opinion
Hale v. Vance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 24, 2003No. C-3-01-151PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 14); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, Chief Judge.
In her Complaint (Doc. # 1), Plaintiff Betty Jean Hale raises five claims for relief. Her First Claim for Relief, stated against Defendant Joseph A. McCrary, a Detective with the City of Trotwood Police Department, arises under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is premised on the allegation that Detective McCrary failed to investigate the conduct of other officers, and in so doing, deprived her of liberty without due process…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- JoAnn Snyder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Hunt v. City of Toledo Law DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Snyder v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Magrum v. MeinkeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Burgess v. FischerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.