Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Fischer

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 4, 2012No. Case No. 3:10-cv-00024PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING IN FULL DEFENDANTS FISCHER, PRINDLE, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF GREENE COUNTY, BARRETT, MCKINNEY, SORT-MAN, AND JORDAN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (DOC. 87), AND FINDING MOOT MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. (DOC.86).

THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for decision on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Doc. 87. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all claims filed against them, claims that are based upon a police takedown of Plaintiff…

2Cases cited37 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013