Hunt v. City of Toledo Law Department
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision and Order
VERNELIS K. ARMSTRONG, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have consented to the Magistrate’s jurisdiction in this civil rights case filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 28), Plaintiffs’ Opposition (Docket No. 36) and Defendants’ Reply (Docket No. 39). For the reasons that follow, the undersigned Grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment but retains jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ Excessive Force Claim.
I. Jurisdiction
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties pursuant…
2Cases cited126 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- David v. MatterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Garmback v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- David v. MatterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Blue Train, Inc. v. City of Cleveland, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Callan v. KempfDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.