Legal Opinion

Hunt v. City of Toledo Law Department

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 30, 2012No. Case No. 3:10 CV 2896PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision and Order

VERNELIS K. ARMSTRONG, United States Magistrate Judge.

The parties have consented to the Magistrate’s jurisdiction in this civil rights case filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 28), Plaintiffs’ Opposition (Docket No. 36) and Defendants’ Reply (Docket No. 39). For the reasons that follow, the undersigned Grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment but retains jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ Excessive Force Claim.

I. Jurisdiction

This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties pursuant…

2Cases cited126 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. David v. MatterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Garmback v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. David v. MatterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Blue Train, Inc. v. City of Cleveland, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  5. Callan v. KempfDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API