Jankovich v. Arens

Two questions are presented by appellants: Whether credible evidence supports the jury’s finding (1) that respondent was in the crosswalk when struck by Arens’ car, and (2) that appellant Arens was ninety per cent and respondent ten per cent negligent.

We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that there is sufficient credible evidence to sustain the finding that respondent was in the crosswalk and that thus appellant was negligent in failing to yield the right of way to the pedestrian.

The evidence was conflicting and it was for the jury to decide which testimony it would believe.

Respo…