Gilson v. Drees Bros.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The test for determining whether a verdict should be directed is whether “the evidence is so clear and convincing as reasonably to permit unbiased and impartial minds to come to but one conclusion.” Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co. (1933), 212 Wis. 530, 533, 250 N. W. 405. See also McDonald v. Bituminous Casualty Corp. (1960), 11 Wis. (2d) 202, 205, 105 N. W. (2d) 312; Wadoz v. United National Indemnity Co. (1957), 274 Wis. 383, 390, 80 N. W. (2d) 262.
*255Another rule which has pervaded our study of this appeal is the familiar one which requires a court in weighing a defendant’s motion for a directed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Rudzinski v. Warner Theatres, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Brittain v. BoothWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Sunday v. Stratton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.