Legal Opinion

Gilson v. Drees Bros.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1963PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The test for determining whether a verdict should be directed is whether “the evidence is so clear and convincing as reasonably to permit unbiased and impartial minds to come to but one conclusion.” Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co. (1933), 212 Wis. 530, 533, 250 N. W. 405. See also McDonald v. Bituminous Casualty Corp. (1960), 11 Wis. (2d) 202, 205, 105 N. W. (2d) 312; Wadoz v. United National Indemnity Co. (1957), 274 Wis. 383, 390, 80 N. W. (2d) 262.

*255Another rule which has pervaded our study of this appeal is the familiar one which requires a court in weighing a defendant’s motion for a directed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Rudzinski v. Warner Theatres, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Brittain v. BoothWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Sunday v. Stratton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API