Legal Opinion

Henry v. La Grou

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The only question presented on this appeal is whether there is any credible evidence to support the verdict which the jury returned. Counsel recognize the well established proposition that when there is any credible evidence which, under any reasonable view, will admit of an inference either for or against the plaintiff, then the rule that the proper inference to be drawn therefrom is a question for the jury should be firmly adhered to. However, defendant’s counsel contend that, in this case, the plaintiff’s testimony is contrary to certain physical facts and reasonable probabilities and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Halamka v. SchneiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Sparling v. United States Sugar Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Dolphin v. Peacock Mining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Davies v. J. D. Wilson Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Braatz v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. RussellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API