Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Police Pension Board

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1959No. 6592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This appeal is by plaintiff who sued in the trial court for a declaratory judgment that, as to him and others similarly situated, the Legislative amendment in 1952 of the “Police Pension Act of 1937” was void and unconstitutional, and praying for the fixing of his pension under the terms of the first *386of the two legislative enactments. The trial court by its judgment upheld the applicability and constitutionality of the amendment. The instant appeal presents another facet to the problem determined in the recent case of Police Pension Board for City of Tucson v. Denney, 84 Ariz.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bender v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Wirtz v. NestosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension & Retirement System v. KernSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Opinion No. 72-146 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972
  4. Robinson v. Police Pension BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API