Legal Opinion

Bender v. Anglin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 12, 1950No. 17043PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

On the subject of pensions, in 40’ Am. Jur., 981, § 24, it is said: “The unquestioned general rule is that a pension granted by the public authorities is not a contractual obligation but a gratuitous allowance, in the continuance of which the pensioner has no vested right, and that a pension is accordingly terminable at the will of the grantor, either in whole or in part.” This general rule is applicable to gratuities as distinguished from grants for a consideration. It controls in those cases where the laws providing therefor are so construed as to hold that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. City of Dallas v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Trotzier v. McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Spina v. Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension Fund CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Phillip v. Public School Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Wagoner v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Police Pension & Relief Board v. McPhailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Withers v. RegisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API