Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Police Pension Board

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1959No. 6592Published

1Opinion of the Court

85 Ariz. 384 (1959)

339 P.2d 739

Roy G. ROBINSON, Appellant,

v.

POLICE PENSION BOARD for the CITY OF TUCSON, Appellee.

No. 6592.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

May 20, 1959.

William F. Kimball, Tucson, for appellant.

F. Dale Healy, Jr., Tucson, for appellee.

UDALL, Justice.

This appeal is by plaintiff who sued in the trial court for a declaratory judgment that, as to him and others similarly situated, the Legislative amendment in 1952 of the "Police Pension Act of 1937" was void and unconstitutional, and praying for the fixing of his pension under the terms of the first of the two legislative enactments. The…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API