Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 15, 2005No. 20040752-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Nevin and Denise Pratt were named as defendants in a lawsuit against alleged members of a polygamous cult. Counsel for plaintiff in that case held a press conference about the lawsuit, out of which this defamation action arose. In this appeal, the Pratts seek to overturn a ruling on summary judgment dismissing their lawsuit with prejudice. Specifically, the Pratts appeal the trial court’s application of the judicial proceeding privilege and group defamation doctrine to bar their claims. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On February 11, 2004, the Pratts brought claims of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. State v. GeukgeuzianUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Krouse v. BowerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Badger v. Brooklyn Canal CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Francis v. State, Utah Division of Wildlife ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Francis v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Dimick v. OHC Liquidation TrustCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. Francis v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API