Dimick v. OHC Liquidation Trust
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNE, Judge:
T1 Plaintiffs Reid 1 and Christopher Dimick (the Dimicks) collectively appeal the district court's grant of Defendant OHC Liquidation Trust's 2 (Oakwood) motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
12 Before reciting the facts, we note that in reviewing a grant of a motion for summary judgment, "we are to review the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Hale v. Beckstead, 2005 UT 24, ¶ 2, 116 P.3d 263 (quotations and citation omitted). We state the facts in this case accordingly.
¶ 3 On May 18, 1998,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hale v. BecksteadUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Gorostieta v. ParkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Jensen v. Intermountain Power AgencyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Delaney v. Towmotor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Wayment v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Niemela v. Imperial Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- Stevens v. LaVerkin CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- Egbert v. NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- Herrod v. Metal Powder ProductsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.