State v. Geukgeuzian
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:
II1 Defendant Stephen Lamar Geukgeuzi-an was convicted of tampering with a witness. The court of appeals reversed his conviction, reasoning that the trial court’s failure to include a mens rea element in its jury instruction resulted in manifest injustice. We conclude that defendant invited the error when he proposed a jury instruction that purported to include all the essential elements of the offense but, like the trial court’s instruction he challenges on appeal, failed to include a mens rea element. We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 “We recite the facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. CaseyUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. PerdueCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PinderUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.