Legal Opinion

State v. Geukgeuzian

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2004No. 20020460PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:

II1 Defendant Stephen Lamar Geukgeuzi-an was convicted of tampering with a witness. The court of appeals reversed his conviction, reasoning that the trial court’s failure to include a mens rea element in its jury instruction resulted in manifest injustice. We conclude that defendant invited the error when he proposed a jury instruction that purported to include all the essential elements of the offense but, like the trial court’s instruction he challenges on appeal, failed to include a mens rea element. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 “We recite the facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. CaseyUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. PerdueCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. PinderUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API