Krouse v. Bower
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
11 We are asked to decide whether a demand letter written by counsel for defendants that threatened legal action and allegedly defamed plaintiffs is subject to the judicial proceeding privilege. We are also ' presented with whether the letter threatening suit lost its alleged privilege because it was excessively published, having been sent to counsel for the owners' association, with copies also being distributed to each member of the owners' association. The trial court granted defendants' motion to dismiss, concluding that the letter was privileged. We affirm. >
STANDARD OF…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- DeBry v. GodbeUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Price v. ArmourUtah Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Oakwood Village LLC v. Albertsons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Russell Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.