Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Company
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice:
Wesley Badger and Utah Land Inc. (“private well plaintiffs”) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Brooklyn Canal Company and the State Engineer. The district court found that plaintiffs did not make known the nature of their private well rights in a protest hearing before the State Engineer and therefore waived the right to claim any impairment to private well rights. We affirm.
Brooklyn Canal Company is a nonprofit mutual water corporation formed for the purpose of delivering water to its Sevier County shareholders.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. Keith Railway Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Katz v. PierceUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Hart v. Salt Lake County CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- State v. LabrumUtah Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Manzanares v. ByingtonUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- O'DEA v. OleaUtah Supreme Court · 2009
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.