in the Interest of T.C. and G.C., Children
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I. Introduction and Procedural Background
This appeal arises from the trial court’s determination that Appellants’ 1 appeals from the termination of their rights to T.C. and G.C. would be frivolous. After a four-day jury trial, the jury found by clear and convincing evidence that Appellants’ rights to T.C. and G.C. should be terminated, and the trial court signed a final order reflecting the jury’s findings. The trial court subsequently held the hearing required by family code section 263.405(d) and denied father’s motion for new trial, found that mother and father…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Quick v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Wilson v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- De La Vega v. Taco Cabana, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In the Interest of S.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- In the Interest of V.I.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- In Re VI, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- In the Interest of V.I.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- In the Interest of V.I.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.