Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Andrews
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1999No. 98-0216PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch
in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice OWEN, Justice BAKER, Justice ABBOTT, Justice HANKINSON, Justice O’NEILL, and Justice GONZALES join.
This case presents issues similar to those presented in Proctor v. Andrews.1 In Proctor, we held that subsection 143.057(d) of the Texas Civil Service Act,2 which authorizes arbitration of police officer and firefighter disciplinary disputes by a private “neutral qualified arbitrator,” neither unconstitutionally delegates authority to a private entity under article III, section 1 of the Texas Constitution nor violates the home rule provision in article…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Fort Worth v. ZimlichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- The City of Houston v. Steve WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Neeley v. West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- in Re State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2015
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.