In the Interest of S.T.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
Donald Taylor appeals from a decree terminating his parental rights with respect to his daughter S.T.1 In a post-judgment hearing under section 263.405(g) of the Family Code, the trial court determined that Donald’s appeal is frivolous, and Donald challenges that determination. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 263.405(g) (Vernon Supp.2007); In re S.T., 242 S.W.3d 923, 926 (Tex.App.-Waco 2008, order) (per curiam); In re K.D., 202 S.W.3d 860, 866 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2006, no pet.). We will affirm the court’s determination that the appeal is frivolous and the court’s decree…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- In the Interest of J.T.G., H.N.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In the Interest of S.M., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
- In the Interest of J.L.J., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
- in the Interest of B.N., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
- E. F. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- In Re Jlj, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.