Legal Opinion

Baker Gin Co. v. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1912No. 1496PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Garvin County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by the N. S. Sherman Machine & Iron works against the Baker Gin Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.

On January 7, 1908, N. S. Sherman and others, partners, doing business as N. S. Sherman Machine & Iron Works, sued W. U. Baker and others, partners, doing business as Baker Gin Company, on two like promissory notes dated October 16, 1907, payable, respectively, in 30 days and 60 days thereafter, the second of which reads:

“$200.00. Oklahoma City, Okla., Oct. 16th, 1907. Sixty days after date I promise to pay to N. S. Sherman Machine and Iron Works or bearer, two hundred dollars at the office of N. S. Sherman Machine and Iron Works with interest from date at the rate of ten per centum per…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Churchman v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Clowers v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Goss v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Moore v. StaserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. McClain v. Continental Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Webster Drilling Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  4. Kemp v. MetzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Webster Drilling Company v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API