Legal Opinion

Moore v. Staser

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1892No. 651PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Erom the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

The issues in this ease were presented to the court below, upon an agreed statement of facts, under section 553, R. S. 1881. Erom the statement filed, it appears that appellant held a note against the appellees, which contained an unconditional stipulation for the payment of “ attorney’s fees.” The note was past due, and appellant placed it in the hands of a regular practicing attorney for collection, Avith instructions to collect the same without delay. The attorney notified appellees, by mail, that he held the note for collection, and enclosed with the notice a statement of the amount of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Kennedy v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Churchman v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Goss v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Rouyer v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Williams v. DockwillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Winslow Gas Co. v. PlostIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Shoup v. SneppIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API