Legal Opinion

Goss v. Bowen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1885No. 12,125PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

To a complaint on a promissory note, the defendants, answered to so much of it as sought to enforce a stipulation allowing 10 per cent, attorney’s fees for collection, in substance, that both before and after the maturity of the note they had tendered to the plaintiff the amount of the principal and interest due thereon; that the plaintiff declined to receive it, and requested them to retain the money; that on the day on which the note fell due, one of the defendants made inquiry at the plaintiff’s house for him, and received information that he had gone to the State of Ohio, to be absent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Billingsley v. DeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Smith v. FeltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Eichholtz v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hazelett v. UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States Health & Accident Insurance v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. Moore v. StaserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. McBride v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Rouyer v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API