Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Metz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 1946No. 32179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action on a promissory note brought by E. W. Metz, a sole trader doing business as Cushing Machine & Tool Company, hereinafter called plaintiff, against R. L. Kemp, defendant, to recover on a promissory note in the principal sum of $246.11, executed July 18, 1939. Plaintiff sought recovery of $354.80, with interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent per annum and for an attorney’s fee and costs of the action.

The defendant counterclaimed by alleging a delivery of certain personal property in partial payment of said indebtedness. On a trial to a jury a verdict was rendered for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McClain v. Continental Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Baker Gin Co. v. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warner v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
  2. Webster Drilling Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  3. Webster Drilling Company v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API