Legal Opinion

Hillhouse v. Wolf

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided December 26, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 61PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeWOLF, J.

This is an action in conversion. The trial court gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff from which the defendant has taken this appeal.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. In February, 1951,. plaintiff sold a ranch to the defendant who then went into possession of it. The sale of the ranch did not include the selling or purchasing of any of the personal property on the premises. At the' time plaintiff turned over possession of the ranch there was left behind a sulphuring machine which is the subject matter of this lawsuit.

The defendant first discovered this sulphuring machine several…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. First National Bank v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Rose v. Dunk-Harbison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cline v. Reetz-LaioloDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Niiya v. GotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Hillhouse v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Barnes v. WittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Brent L. Sellick v. Clipper Yacht Company, a Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API