Barnes v. Witt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to the first amended complaint without leave to amend and entered a judgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiffs ’ main contention on appeal appears to be that the court erred in setting aside an earlier default of the defendant. The appellants also contend that the court’s ruling on the demurrer was erroneous, particularly because it was without leave to amend.
The original complaint in the case was filed on August 16, 1961, in which it was alleged that the defendant on or about September 20, 1955: ‘ ‘. . . did illegally and with malicious intent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Jones v. Title Guaranty Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berman v. KlassmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970