Legal Opinion
Hillhouse v. Wolf
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 26, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
166 Cal.App.2d Supp. 833 (1958)
MARTIN HILLHOUSE, Respondent,
v.
VERNON WOLF, Appellant.
California Court of Appeals.
Dec. 26, 1958.
Wilbur K. Kessler for Appellant.
Maurice E. Smith and Lerrigo, Thuesen, Thompson & Thompson for Respondent.
DeWOLF, J.
This is an action in conversion. The trial court gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff from which the defendant has taken this appeal.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. In February, 1951, plaintiff sold a ranch to the defendant who then went into possession of it. The sale of the ranch did not include the selling or purchasing of any of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- First National Bank v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Rose v. Dunk-Harbison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Hillhouse v. WolfAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cline v. Reetz-LaioloDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Niiya v. GotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Barnes v. WittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Brent L. Sellick v. Clipper Yacht Company, a Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967