Fleenor v. Erickson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
Plaintiffs, Arthur L. Fleenor and his wife, instituted this action to recover for the damage they suffered when the refrigeration locker plant which they installed in the basement of their store building froze the ground underneath the floor causing the building to buckle and necessitating the closing of the plant.
Original defendants to the action were Wood Conversion Company, a foreign corporation; Paul L. Proctor, sales representative for that company, and his wife; E. G. Erickson and Neis G. Lindh, copartners under the firm name of Edmonds Lumber Company, and their respective wives.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. CushmanWashington Supreme Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daughtry v. Jet Aeration Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Peterson v. Lamb Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Odom v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- State v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Dimoff v. Ernie Majer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.