Legal Opinion
Dimoff v. Ernie Majer, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1960No. 35179PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
October 9, 1956, Ernie Majer, Inc., repossessed a Ford truck it had previously sold on contract to Pete Dimoff and Lewis Raikoglo on or about May 18,1956. The purchase agreement contained, inter alia, the following:
“Manufacturer’s Warranty is shown on back of this order. It is agreed that there are no other warranties, either expressed or implied covering said car. (2) This order is not binding on dealer until accepted by dealer in writing. (3) I have read the matter printed on the back hereof and agree to it as a part of this order the same as if it were printed above my signature. . . .
“Deal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Freeman v. NavarreWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Hendricks v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Daughtry v. Jet Aeration Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Berg v. General Motors Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- Kasey v. Suburban Gas Heat of Kennewick, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.