Mazetti v. Armour & Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered November 20, 1912, dismissing an action in tort, on sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs were operating a profitable restaurant in the city of Seattle, and dealing with the general public as their patrons; that defendant Armour & Company is engaged in the business of manufacturing, and selling to the public generally, meats and products to be used as food; that it maintains a place of business in Seattle, Washington, from which it sells and distributes its goods, representing and holding out to the general public that its goods are pure, wholesome and fit food for human beings; that on June 16, 1912, plaintiffs, in the usual course and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Tomlinson v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Bishop v. WeberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Watson v. Augusta Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Bigelow v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.