Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Paul W. Bounds Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1934No. Appeal, 22PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Is appellant a manufacturing corporation and therefore exempt from the payment of a capital stock tax?

Its charter shows that it was organized for the purpose of “Contracting and carrying on a general business as cut stone contractors in both natural and artificial stone, including erecting, setting, cutting and carving and otherwise fabricating natural and artificial stone, finishing and setting interior marble, and generally doing and performing any and all work as builders and contractors, and with that end in view to solicit, obtain work and perform and carry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. Sunbeam Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Commonwealth v. Lowry-Rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Commonwealth v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Morrison-Kudson Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  3. House of Lloyd, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. Perfect Photo, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Horigan v. City of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API