Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sunbeam Water Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1925No. Appeal, 13PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaefer,

Is a corporation producing distilled water a manufacturing corporation and therefore exempt from the payment of capital stock taxes under the terms of the Act of July 22, 1913, P. L. 903? The court below decided in favor of the exemption. The Commonwealth appeals.

We think no good purpose would be served by a review of all the cases in which the determination has been that certain corporations were or were not manufacturing corporations and liable or not liable for the payment of a capital stock tax. As was said by Mr. Justice Sadler, then in the common pleas and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Callery's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Commonwealth v. Lowry-Rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Commonwealth v. John T. Dyer Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Academy of Fine Arts v. Philadelphia CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Armour and Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Bayer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Commonwealth v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API