Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Perfect Photo, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 1977No. Appeal, No. 351 Tr. Dkt. 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

As we focus in upon the issue of this appeal, we discern a visible image of a photofinisher seeking a ruling that it is engaged in manufacturing and therefore exempt from capital stock taxation under Section 21 of the Capital Stock Tax Act of June 1, 1889, P.L. 420, as amended (Act).1 Perfect Photo, Incorporated (taxpayer) contests a decision of the Board of Finance *318and Revenue which sustained a resettlement by the Department of Revenue of the taxpayer’s capital stock tax for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1966.2

We make the following

Findings on Fact

1. Taxpayer was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Commonwealth v. Deitch Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. Lowry-Rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Commonwealth v. Berlo Vending Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Commonwealth v. McCrady-rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Colorcraft Corp. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Bain v. Department of Revenue Oregon Aqua-Foods, Inc.Oregon Tax Court · 1981
  4. McElhaney Cattle Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Remmey v. Centennial School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API