Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
Defendant company, a Pennsylvania corporation, whose place of business is in the Borough of Phoenix-ville, is engaged in “manufacturing, packing and selling beef and pork products” at wholesale, and its contention here is that the disputed articles enumerated in the case stated as follows: (1) sweet pickled meat, i. e. pickled and dry salt pork; (2) smoked skin hams, smoked regular hams, smoked butts, smoked picnics, smoked rib bacon, smoked boneless bacon and smoked dry cured bacon; and (3) hides and skins, are exempt from assessment for mercantile license tax,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- People Ex Rel. New England Dressed Meat & Wool Co. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- City of Lexington v. Lexington Leader Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Commonwealth v. Welsh Mountain Mining & Kaolin Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Deitch Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Armour and Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.