Legal Opinion

Caylor v. Casto

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1933No. 31,105PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to cancel a contract for the exchange of real estate.

The petition alleged the execution of a contract whereby plaintiffs were to exchange 400 acres of land in Elk county for at least five separate pieces of real estate in the city of Osawatomie, all of said real estate being subject to encumbrances; that after the contract was executed it was discovered defendant did not have title to one lot he had contracted to convey and that the encumbrance was $522.98 more than represented; that a supplemental contract was made by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brashear v. RabensteinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Coffeyville Mining & Gas Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Smith v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Moffatt v. FoutsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Stewart v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greep v. BrunsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Wilkey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Rodgers v. CrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Imthurn v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API