Legal Opinion

Coffeyville Mining & Gas Co. v. Carter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1902No. 11,986PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from Montgomery district court; A. H. Skid-more, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*566The opinion of the court was delivered by.Pollock, J.:

This action was brought by Lulu Carter, daughter, and administratrix of the estate, of David Carter, a widower, deceased, against the Coffeyville Mining and Gas Company, to recover damages j for the death of deceased by wrongful act. The facts| necessary to a determination of this controversy are,' in substance, as follows: Defendant put down and| was the owner of-a natural-gas well on lot 14, block 62, in the city of Coffeyville. East of this gas-well about fifty feet there was erected a two-story brick building. Immediately south of this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Koelsch v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Augusta Railway Co. v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Dayharsh v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  5. Tetherow v. St. Joseph & Des Moines RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McClure v. Hoopeston Gas & Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Powell v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Richey & Gilbert Co. v. Northwestern Natural Gas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Luengene v. Consumers Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API