Legal Opinion

Wilkey v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1939No. 6 Div. 603PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The several assignments of error challenge the action of the trial court in giving to the opening statement of appellants’ -counsel, defining the issues of fact to the jury, evidential effect authorizing the general affirmative charge against appellants.

Appellants thus state the question: A jury having been impaneled and sworn and the issue of fact formed by the pleadings, the court was without authority to conclude the case without the introduction of the evidence (and to do this against defendants’ objection) merely on counsel’s opening statement to the jury.

Such statement…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. Foster & Creighton Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Wilkey v. State Ex Rel. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API