Legal Opinion

Smith v. King

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 15, 1980No. 8126-8-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.

The defendant, King, appeals from a judgment establishing the location of an easement across the plaintiffs' real property. He asserts that the trial court erred in locating the easement.

When the plaintiffs, the Smiths, purchased their property from Arthur and Lillian Froland in 1954, the Frolands reserved the right to select the location of an easement over the Smiths' land. On June 2, 1977, after her husband's death, Mrs. Froland conveyed her property to King. Before doing so, her lawyer sent the Smiths' lawyer a quitclaim deed purporting to convey an easement to Mrs. Froland over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ormiston v. BoastWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bakke v. Columbia Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Rhoades v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Koepke Sayles & Co. v. LustigWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sunnyside Valley Irr. Dist. v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mielke v. Yellowstone Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Zunino v. RajewskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API