Legal Opinion
Sunnyside Valley Irr. Dist. v. Dickie
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 2003No. 72635-3PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
73 P.3d 369 (2003)
149 Wash.2d 873
SUNNYSIDE VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a quasi-municipal corporation, Respondent,
v.
Dyke DICKIE and Jane Doe Dickie, husband and wife, Petitioners.
No. 72635-3.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued February 25, 2003.
Decided July 24, 2003.
John Strother Moore, Yakima, for petitioners.
Charles Camillus Flower, Patrick Michael Andreotti, Yakima, for respondent.
FAIRHURST, J.
Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District (SVID) maintains irrigation ditches, commonly referred to as laterals, in the Yakima County region. In general, adjacent landowners have granted express…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Veach v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Stieneke v. RussiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Clayton v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Clayton v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Maier v. GISKECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.