Legal Opinion

Ormiston v. Boast

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1966No. 38438PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The plaintiff claims the right to use a 20-foot roadway, established in 1946, running north and south along the boundary line between two 80-acre tracts. It connects at its northern terminus with a public road running east and west along the north boundary lines of the two eighties, and its southern terminus is another public road running east and west along the south boundary lines of the two eighties.

The plaintiff owns the north half of the west eighty (herein called Tract A); and the defendants own the south half of the west eighty (herein called Tract C) and all of the east eighty (herein…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Granquist v. McKeanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bakke v. Columbia Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Anderson v. Secret Harbor Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. GRANITE BEACH HOLDINGS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Granite Beach Holdings, L.L.C. v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Lee v. LozierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API