Zunino v. Rajewski
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Kulik, J.
This case addresses the fundamental issue of what is necessary to create an easement. We hold that the documents here designated as “private road and utility easements” simply do not create easements because they lack the required statement of intent to transfer property. We affirm the trial court.
FACTS
¶2 Gayle Anderberg sold two parcels of property to Virgil and Julie Zabinski and three parcels to Donald Zunino. The deeds for these parcels did not create easements; but for *217each sale, Ms. Anderberg recorded a “private road and utility easement” document so that she could obtain a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Dorsey v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Beebe v. SwerdaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Norcon Builders, LLC v. GMP Homes VG, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Bale v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Mark Hanna, et ux v. Allan Margitan, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Veith v. Xterra Wetsuits, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.