Legal Opinion
Bassett v. Merchants Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 26, 1934PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The issues presented in these three cases are so similar that they can best be discussed together. Each raises the question whether the particular claimant is entitled to have the claim presented against the receiver allowed as one for a deposit under the provisions of § 3935 of the General Statutes, providing the order in which the funds of a bank or trust company in receivership shall be distributed. In each case the claimant was a depositor in the defendant bank. In one case, the defendant bank issued its draft payable to the agent of claimant, upon an order for the withdrawal of a portion…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Carson v. Federal Reserve BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- McFadden v. FollrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Borst v. RuffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Hospital of St. Raphael v. New Haven Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Reade v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Kossover v. Willimantic Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.