Legal Opinion

Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 27, 1932PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a reservation seeking advice as to certain questions which have arisen in receivership proceedings brought against the defendant bank. On January 2d 1932, before the hour of the opening of the bank for business, the bank commissioner of the State, acting pursuant to § 3870 of the General Statutes, issued an order restraining the defendant from paying out funds or receiving deposits. On January 7th, 1932, upon the application of the commissioner, a temporary receiver of the defendant was appointed by the Superior Court, and on the same day he duly qualified as such and has been acting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Leonard Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Kelly v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. RosenbushMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Dole v. ChattabrigaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Harper v. HarperMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Leary v. Citizens & Manufacturers National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API