Legal Opinion

Meek v. Daugherty

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 1908No. 2121, Okla. TPublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; B. F. Burwcll, Judge. Action by Marcus Daugherty against Mary A. Meek for the contract price for the construction of a wall. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

On the 27th day of April, 1901, Marcus Daugherty and Mary E. Meek, owners, respectively, of lots 6 and 7 in block 25 of Choctaw addition to the city of Shawnee, entered into a contract whereby it was agreed that a stone wall should be built at pnce on the boundary line between their said lots. Marcus Daugherty, defendant in error, proceeded immediately to construct a wall as provided in the contract; but, before he had completed it, it fell and crumbled, so that the material therein was not fit for use, and was removed by plaintiff in error, who rebuilt the wall. Plaintiff in error refused…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Tobin v. O'BrieterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. Huyett & Smith Manufacturing Co. v. Chicago Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Shepard & Playford v. John G. Allen & SonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Brison v. McKellopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Davidson v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Snyder v. NossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Dunn v. T. J. Cannon Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API